<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>The Ethiopian Bible Is Not Of God</title>
        <link>https://videos.graftedbranchministry.org/videos/watch/1ebfaca7-49f0-4e6c-8aa8-395abff1f443</link>
        <description>The Ethiopian Bible is not for Christians who fear the Lord. This book of blaspheme is only for fools that want to pretend they are Christian while they have more interest in ancient alien theories and chasing after bigfoot, than they have an interest in the word of God. In this study Isaac and I break down some very simple points to show how the Ethiopian Bible is not of God, but is of Baal. That is why we burned it just as Josiah had done, doing what was right in the sight of the Lord (2 Kings 22:1-2 KJV). 2 Kings 23:5-6 KJV  And he put down the idolatrous priests, whom the kings of Judah had ordained to burn incense in the high places in the cities of Judah, and in the places round about Jerusalem; them also that burned incense unto Baal, to the sun, and to the moon, and to the planets, and to all the host of heaven.  (6)  And he brought out the grove from the house of the LORD, without Jerusalem, unto the brook Kidron, and burned it at the brook Kidron, and stamped it small to powder, and cast the powder thereof upon the graves of the children of the people., A link to check the book of blaspheme yourself: https://online.fliphtml5.com/ekjsx/blhe/#p=1 How to be saved https://videos.graftedbranchministry.org/w/o3nKhTsDPf517TpNMjJ5JL CONTACT INFO: Grafted.Branch.Ministry@gmail.com Grafted Branch Ministry P.O. Box 44 Meridian, MS 39302 USA Recorded 04/12/2026</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 12:31:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
        <generator>PeerTube - https://videos.graftedbranchministry.org</generator>
        
        <copyright>All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified in the terms specified at https://videos.graftedbranchministry.org/about and potential licenses granted by each content's rightholder.</copyright>
        <atom:link href="https://videos.graftedbranchministry.org/feeds/video-comments.xml?videoId=1ebfaca7-49f0-4e6c-8aa8-395abff1f443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The Ethiopian Bible Is Not Of God - scotty]]></title>
            <link>https://videos.graftedbranchministry.org/w/4Ne49PUsueyo81JcYpAcxR;threadId=53</link>
            <guid>https://videos.graftedbranchministry.org/w/4Ne49PUsueyo81JcYpAcxR;threadId=53</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 14:05:16 GMT</pubDate>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@brandon_s ... Also to note that the word of God being purified seven times according to Psalm 12:6 dose not mean that the 1611 was the final purification. Because the matter arises that if the word of God needed to be purified seven times, then when was the first and what is the seventh. The first could not begin until all the word had been written. So the vain disputers arguing for the "original" manuscripts to be the pure word of God are already discredited by the word of God. But if you had seen the study on the PCE you can see even other minor purifications that had taken place contextually for the word of God to be purified. And only by the working of God is this done seeing that the word of God is of no private interpretation and only men of God being moved by the Holy Ghost had any part. So it is the working of God as much as the things Moses had done are the working of God... for Moses did not part the sea but God did (Exodus 14:13-16 &amp; 21)...</p>
<ul>
<li>2 Peter 1:20-21 KJV  Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.  (21)  For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
            <dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The Ethiopian Bible Is Not Of God - scotty]]></title>
            <link>https://videos.graftedbranchministry.org/w/4Ne49PUsueyo81JcYpAcxR;threadId=53</link>
            <guid>https://videos.graftedbranchministry.org/w/4Ne49PUsueyo81JcYpAcxR;threadId=53</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 12:35:08 GMT</pubDate>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@brandon_s ... Yeah it is nutty, it does not take much reading of the apocrypha to realize it is not the word of God as for instruction toward God. They are for the most part historical books that were indeed written by man even including their own traditions. Traditions that the Lord had to reprove over and over again through out the Old Testament. When looking at the word of God we must first understand that there was a purification process according to the word of God for the word of God in the earth.</p>
<ul>
<li>Psalms 12:6 KJV  The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.</li>
</ul>
<p>It is as if to say the translators to the readers should be preserved and read as if of God with scripture if you want to pretend Apocryphal books should be treated as if they are important.</p>
<p>Their were plain errors in the 1611 and including the Apocrypha was one of those mistakes. I mean even the Publisher's Preface right at the beginning of the Apocrypha, (it being separated from the Old and New Testament,) says "the word APOCRYPHA which means hidden or secret is used to distinguish religious writings that are not considered authoritative from those that are".<br />
King James himself said he omits the Apocrypha because he is no papist. This he wrote in 1599. Showing a clear stance that the Apocrypha was not accepted to be scripture even before the 1611 AV came to be. It is merely traditional to have it.<br />
Link:<br />
<a href="https://www.preservedwords.com/bp/apocryphakjb.html#:~:text=%E2%80%9CAs%20to%20the%20Apocriphe%20bookes%2C%20I%20omit%20them%20because%20I%20am%20no%20Papist%E2%80%9D%20(Book%20I%3A13%2C%20Basilicon%20Doron).%20%C2%A0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.preservedwords.com/bp/apocryphakjb.html#:~:text=“As to the Apocriphe bookes%2C I omit them because I am no Papist” (Book I%3A13%2C Basilicon Doron).  </a></p>
<p>The 1611 translators left these books completely separate from scripture... labeling clearly the beginning and the end of the apocrypha. The Translators The Readers constantly make clear they are opposed to the papist and the Catholics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            <dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The Ethiopian Bible Is Not Of God - Brandon]]></title>
            <link>https://videos.graftedbranchministry.org/w/4Ne49PUsueyo81JcYpAcxR;threadId=53</link>
            <guid>https://videos.graftedbranchministry.org/w/4Ne49PUsueyo81JcYpAcxR;threadId=53</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 23:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff! I have heard about some supposed "King James Bible believers" starting to accept the apocrypha because it was in the 1611 version. It was separated and taken out for a reason, why go back and try to undo what was corrected? It's crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            <dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>